A deep dive into selected work sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic and the ‘Living with COVID’ phase: understanding similarities and differences in practice, perceptions and preparedness.

Anna Coleman, Rebecca Canham, Katie Clabon, Paniz Hosseini, Sheena Johnson, Martie Van Tongeren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: When it comes to controlling workplace transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, different workplaces and industrial sectors face different challenges, both in terms of likely transmission routes and which control measures can be practically, economically and effectively implemented. This paper considers a large body of research in the UK across different work sectors and time points during the COVID-19 pandemic to better understand mitigation measures, challenges to mitigating the risk of SARS COV-2 transmission, knowledge gaps, and barriers and enablers to controlling viral transmission.
Methods: Data is drawn from two phases of research. Phase One gathered data from an interactive workshop (April 2022) where PROTECT researchers working across eight work sectors shared knowledge and expertise from research conducted between 2020 and 2022. Phase Two revisited six of these sectors to explore participants’ views on the ‘living with COVID’ phase of the pandemic (February – October 2022) through qualitative interviews.
Results: Our findings emphasise the importance of considering the characteristics of each work sector (and their sub-sectors), relative to the physical workplace and workforce, the ways organisations operate and how they interact with the public. Study findings show that participant’s Page 1 of 19 Annals of Work Exposures and Healthviews and organisational practices changed quickly and significantly over the course of the pandemic. Most participants initially perceived that the majority of risk mitigations would remain in place for the foreseeable future. However, following the change in Government Guidance towards ‘Living with COVID’, most mitigation measures were quickly removed and it had become necessary for sectors/organisations to restore normal operations, thereby treating the COVID-19 virus like any other illness, whilst remaining prepared for future health emergencies that may arise.
Conclusion: We suggest that national policy makers and organisational leaders remain mindful of the lessons learned and knowledge gained at all levels (national, regional, local, organisational, and individual) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We make recommendations in support of recovery as sectors/organisations continue ‘Living with COVID’ and other respiratory diseases; balanced with longer term planning for the next public health crisis.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of Work Exposures and health
Early online date23 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Sept 2023

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • COVID-19
  • Workplace transmission
  • Workplace transmission risk
  • Industry response
  • Protective practices
  • Prevention and control
  • Worker behaviours

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Thomas Ashton Institute
  • Work and Equalities Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A deep dive into selected work sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic and the ‘Living with COVID’ phase: understanding similarities and differences in practice, perceptions and preparedness.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this