Abstract
Objectives
Talk, Understand and Listen for InPatient Settings (TULIPS) was a multi-centred Randomised Control Trial of an intervention that aimed to increase patient access to psychological therapies on acute mental health wards. This paper aims to: i) describe a strategy for designing a psychological intervention that is implementable in inpatient mental health settings; ii) describe methods for assessing the fidelity of interventions within these settings; iii) report on the extent to which fidelity was achieved in the TULIPS trial.
Methods
The TULIPS intervention was designed using information from a systematic review, stakeholder interviews, pilot work and a consensus workshop. We assessed fidelity to the model in terms of the delivery and dose of essential elements of the intervention, quality of intervention delivery, engagement of participants with the intervention and differentiation between the intervention and usual care.
Results
Although the TULIPS intervention targeted known barriers to the delivery of psychological interventions on mental health wards, we found issues in implementing aspects of the intervention that were dependent upon the participation of members of the multidisciplinary team. Psychologists were able to overcome barriers to delivering individual therapy to patients as this provision was not reliant on the availability of other staff.
Conclusions
The intervention period in the study was six months. A greater period of time with a critical mass of psychological practitioners is needed to embed psychological interventions on inpatient wards. Our fidelity framework and assessment methods can be used by other researchers implementing and testing psychological therapies within inpatient environments.
Talk, Understand and Listen for InPatient Settings (TULIPS) was a multi-centred Randomised Control Trial of an intervention that aimed to increase patient access to psychological therapies on acute mental health wards. This paper aims to: i) describe a strategy for designing a psychological intervention that is implementable in inpatient mental health settings; ii) describe methods for assessing the fidelity of interventions within these settings; iii) report on the extent to which fidelity was achieved in the TULIPS trial.
Methods
The TULIPS intervention was designed using information from a systematic review, stakeholder interviews, pilot work and a consensus workshop. We assessed fidelity to the model in terms of the delivery and dose of essential elements of the intervention, quality of intervention delivery, engagement of participants with the intervention and differentiation between the intervention and usual care.
Results
Although the TULIPS intervention targeted known barriers to the delivery of psychological interventions on mental health wards, we found issues in implementing aspects of the intervention that were dependent upon the participation of members of the multidisciplinary team. Psychologists were able to overcome barriers to delivering individual therapy to patients as this provision was not reliant on the availability of other staff.
Conclusions
The intervention period in the study was six months. A greater period of time with a critical mass of psychological practitioners is needed to embed psychological interventions on inpatient wards. Our fidelity framework and assessment methods can be used by other researchers implementing and testing psychological therapies within inpatient environments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | British Journal of Clinical Psychology |
Early online date | 28 Oct 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 28 Oct 2024 |
Keywords
- Psychosis/schizophrenia
- Case formulation
- Inpatient treatment
- Therapeutic alliance/Therapeutic factors
- Implementation
- Fidelity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ensuring that psychological interventions are delivered as intended on mental health inpatient wards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Impacts
-
Increasing access to psychological therapy on mental health inpatient wards (TULIPS: Talk Understand and Listen for Inpatient Settings)
Berry, K. (Corresponding participant), Haddock, G. (Participant), Bucci, S. (Participant), Lovell, K. (Participant) & Edge, D. (Participant)
Impact: Health and wellbeing, Policy