Ultrasonography-guided Drainage Versus Surgical Drainage for Deep Neck Space Abscesses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Mohammad Alzaid, Mohammed Ramadhan, Ahmad Abul, Mohammad Karam, Abdulmalik Alsaif, Emma Stapleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

76 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective To compare ultrasonography-guided drainage (USD) versus conventional surgical incision and drainage (I&D) in deep neck space abscesses. Methods The study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023466809) and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and recurrence. Heterogeneity and bias risk were assessed, and a fixed effects model was applied. Results Of 646 screened articles, seven studies enrolling 384 participants were included. USD was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (Mean Difference [MD] = -2.31, P < 0.00001), but no statistically significant difference was noted in recurrence rate compared to I&D (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02, P = 0.21). USD appears to be associated with cost savings and better cosmetic outcomes. Conclusion USD was associated with a shorter hospital stay, making it a viable and perhaps more cost-effective alternative. More randomised trials with adequate outcomes reporting are recommended to optimise the available evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalThe Journal of laryngology and otology
Early online date15 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Abscess
  • Cost Savings
  • Drainage
  • Length of Stay
  • Retropharyngeal Abscess
  • Ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ultrasonography-guided Drainage Versus Surgical Drainage for Deep Neck Space Abscesses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this