Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Use of vascular access for haemodialysis in Europe: a report from the ERA-EDTA Registry

  • Marlies Noordzij
  • , Kitty J Jager
  • , Sabine N van der Veer
  • , Reinhard Kramar
  • , Frederic Collart
  • , James G Heaf
  • , Olivera Stojceva-Taneva
  • , Torbjørn Leivestad
  • , Jadranka Buturovic-Ponikvar
  • , Manuel Benítez Sánchez
  • , Fransesc Moreso
  • , Karl G Prütz
  • , Alison Severn
  • , Christoph Wanner
  • , Raymond Vanholder
  • , Pietro Ravani
  • Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry
  • French-Belgian ESRD Registry
  • Ninewells Hospital
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • Swedish Renal Registry
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Academic Medical Center
  • University of Copenhagen
  • St. Cyril and Methodius University
  • Oslo University Hospital
  • The University Medical Centre (Ljubljana)
  • Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez
  • Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology
  • Helsingborg Hospital
  • Universität Würzburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are actively promoted, their use at the start of haemodialysis (HD) seems to be decreasing worldwide. In this paper, we describe recent trends in incidence and prevalence of vascular access types in Europe from 2005 to 2009 and their relationship with patient characteristics and survival.

METHODS: Ten European renal registries participating in the ERA-EDTA Registry provided data on incidence (n = 13,044) and/or prevalence (n = 75,715) of vascular access types. We used logistic regression to assess which factors influence the likelihood to be treated with an AVF rather than another type.

RESULTS: The use of AVFs at the start of HD showed a significant decreasing trend from 42% in 2005 to 32% in 2009 (P < 0.0001), while the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) increased from 58 to 68% (P < 0.0001). A similar evolution pattern was observed for the prevalence; use of AVFs decreased from 66 to 62% and use of CVCs increased from 28 to 32%. There was a large international variation in the use of the different vascular access types. Female patients [adjusted odds ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.90] and those ≥80 years (0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90) were least likely to start HD with an AVF.

CONCLUSION: In Europe, there is a decreasing trend in the use of AVFs and an increasing trend in the use of CVCs at the start and after the start of HD. We cannot explain all between-country variations we found, and more research is needed to clarify how healthcare around vascular access is organized in Europe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1956-64
Number of pages9
JournalNephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical
  • Catheterization, Central Venous
  • Catheters, Indwelling
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Prevalence
  • Prognosis
  • Registries
  • Renal Dialysis
  • Survival Rate
  • Young Adult
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of vascular access for haemodialysis in Europe: a report from the ERA-EDTA Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this